Today, was a fashion ‘don’t’ BONANZA! Can I just say, I risked life and limb this morning, and even got punched by Joey, but I had to bring these to you.
You can thank me (or not) later.
Today was our first full day in Jersey and our last day with Joey before we need to drop him off at school. Having lost a day to Hurricane Irene, we were madly rushing about trying to complete our errands, which included a 3 hour visit to the Verizon kiosk at Quaker Bridge Mall, style mecca of Central Jersey.
I spied the first fashion faux pas, a brilliant realization of one of my major pet peeves, as we were looking for a parking spot at the scenic QB Mall — we drove right past it, and, as we came around the other way, parked, and got out, I pointed it out to Joey. He immediately discerned my intent. “Oh, my God, Mom, don’t you dare. If she sees, she could take out a firearm and kill you.”
We all headed to the same entrance, the three of us naturally falling in behind the lady in question. Joey shot me a warning glance, and then, lockstep with his father, overtook her.
I saw my chance. Now out of view of not only my subject, but also my reproving husband and son, I reached into my bag for my camera and turned it on. As I raised it, I realized we were approaching the entrance, with its reflective glass doors. Not good.
I discreetly lowered the camera until we were through the doors and then, quickly, stepped up and snapped it. Perfect. Joey fell into step with me just as I lowered my camera, and punched me in the arm. “I can’t believe you did it!” he whispered, with a wide grin on his face.
Tell me if you think it was worth it:
Here’s a close-up:
I’ve written about the whole ‘it’s called UNDERwear for a reason’ thing, and don’t want to repeat myself.
I now realize, there are two types of the ‘underwear as outerwear’ crimes.
One is the deliberate, “I’m trying to be sexy and can’t spell ‘skank'” approach. This is the woman who is wearing sexy undergarb, and an audience of one just ain’t enough for her. She wants the whole world to know she’s woman enough to shop at Victoria’s Secret.
Then, there’s this. I’m looking at the photo and trying to get into this woman’s head. Did she simply not notice she wasn’t properly dressed before she left the house? Did no one ever tell her that one’s underwear is private? That it’s immodest and inappropriate to have a really large chunk of your foundation undergarment available for public consumption?
Or, and I think this might be saddest of all — does she not care what she looks like? Or care about modesty?
Please, girls. This is a fashion ‘don’t’ not because I want to poke fun at this woman — this is a fashion ‘don’t’ because I want to implore you to avoid this. It is awful because it implies that you no longer care about putting a reasonable face forward, that you hold yourself in little regard, that you have lost hope.
And, if you ever find yourself knowingly in this situation, and not caring — get thee to a therapist for antidepressants, pronto. You have bigger problems than just visible underwear.
This is also a compelling argument for always carrying a light cardigan with you. And never leaving the house without a quick glance at your rear view. Those two things, especially in tandem, can rectify any number of style sins and save you from falling victim to a blogging shrew.
As if that weren’t enough, after lunch, we headed to Sports Authority to stock up on athletic garb. While we were at it, we came across this. I asked Joey to model, which he willingly did. I say, Marcus Schenkenberg has got nothin’ on him. Keep in mind, not even Marcus the Supermodel could make these look good.
Please keep in mind, someone manufactured these to be SOLD. When we encountered these, my jaw dropped.
I wanted to fall down on my knees with my hands covering my face and cry out, Gollum-like, “Oh, my eyes. The pain! It burnnsss!!!”
These are a CRIME. Not just against style, or fashion, but against all seeing humanity.
They are so ugly, that to call them ugly is an insult to ugly things.
Whoever designed these and then greenlighted their manufacture should be SHOT. Summarily. No jury, no trial. Any proceeds from the sale of these garments should be donated to the seeing. And, there should be an immediate recall of these items with a sharp admonition to the purchasers and a generous cash rebate to remedial fashion school.
Who would wear these? Unless there’s a clown school nearby, I couldn’t fathom who on earth these could be sold to.
Then, I realized.
We’re in New Jersey.
And, before anyone goes, ‘Hey, that’s not fair!” I’ve got two words for you.
Jersey Shore.